A significant portion of the data used to bedrock the concept of "global warming" no longer exists?
If we are to believe Jones’s note to the younger Pielke, CRU adjusted the original data and then lost or destroyed them over twenty years ago. The letter to Warwick Hughes may have been an outright lie. After all, Peter Webster received some of the data this year. So the question remains: What was destroyed or lost, when was it destroyed or lost, and why?
AGW reveals its status as a religion more and more every day. Now we no longer have the original data, we have only the Revealed Word of the Data. "You kinda-sorta have to trust us, stop asking questions, alter your lifestyle to suit our preferences, and give us money."
MmmMMMMMmmmm, that's good religion!
Posts
3 comments:
Stop questioning your betters, dear, THEY'RE SMARTER THAN YOU. Or something. *snort*
Excuse me, while I attempt to muster up some surprise :P
Shhhh... It's not "global warming" anymore. It's "climate change" as temperatures are getting cooler, but in new "unpredictable" ways. First, things will be cold, but then temperatures will get warmer, then warmer, then cooler, then cold again.
Oh, wait. That's the seasons.
Post a Comment